Friday, March 29, 2013

How to travel the world ( Literally i mean)

Every person likes to travel the world, see far flung exotic places, travel to awesome beaches, see world attractions, experience world class cities.. Everyone dreams of traveling the world. So how do you try and make sure you achieve your dream ..

One set of argument has been Travel Abroad , Travel Young - A set of arguments which portray to travel abroad as much as possible when you are young ( Gap Travel,  Backpack after college  etc)  ( young for me someone  below 30 :) ) . But not many are so lucky/rich to do that.

Other set of argument has been Make your career , money  and then travel the world when you are old .- set of arguments which focuses on making your professional ambitions come true.. make as much money as possible and then retire with a round the world trip with your loved one ... Sounds fantastic . Only glitch - We don't know what our future holds.. we may not have energy , time etc .  

A third set of argument has been - Become a management consultant / business executive  and jet set on client's/company expense ( Live the Clooney life  like in 'Up in the Air')  Most possible choice of all three - if you want to do world travel . Unfortunately there can only be few management consultants/business executives in this world and you got to absolute good to make the initial cut of joining the firm/inner club and then second cut of surviving it ( not to mention forget about your personal life ) . Now  as much as it sounds glamorous and awesome, its still business travel and most of your time is really spent working on client/official meetings at work and back at hotel and you actually hardly travel the country ( you do get the opportunity though)  , but yes on flip side you are the best user and  expert on Airports lounges and Hotel suites and star wood points on this planet.. Again great if you want to see Lima Airport , not so great if you want to chill of at Machu Pichu for a week. All said and done, one of the most possible ways to do it .. Now if you want leisure trip with your loved one/kids .. then it becomes a tough one..

A fourth set of argument is  RTW . take a 6 month off and finish a region/list of countries and be back . Its not impossible but you need to be in right conditions/country/lifestyle/ disposable income/professional situation to do this . Requires great planning to pull this off..

So how does an average person travel the world keeping his job/life and yet savor his vacation time to experience new countries every year with his current energy levels.  .. In my opinion , its difficult but  not impossible and definitely needs some discipline and mindset to do it  and living in below mentioned places gives you good advantage to begin thinking of it.

I am not world traveler yet ( not even close)  but i met some world travelers and this post has been some of my experiences and my impressions by conversing with other fellow travelers.

For me the three important things required for regular intl travel are
1. Time : You need time and energy to travel the place . Be it long weekend to do a one city or 2-3 weeks to do one country .. Different travelers use different timelines to travel each place. So one may take 3 weeks to do entire Western Europe ( just exploring  couple of major capitals) or use the same 3 weeks to do just Spain and France .. But in the end you still need those days off to travel . Critical parameter to even consider traveling abroad.

2. Cost  :  Again obvious and very important . Living in India and planning to do East Asia trip is very challenging . Possible but not effective and its costly  . Cost/Economy/PPP is why some nationalities do just  better than others .

3. Resources: Quite important and quite underrated parameter which affects 1 and 2 .. Explains why some travelers from some countries do just so much better than  most .

Resources is defined as gamut of entire activities/things you need to do smoother and  easy travel .  This means easy access to intl airports which has great affordable connections to destinations you want to travel . Easy access to visa/passport services. Not many realize there is extra cost and time people end up paying just to get the visa . Living in capital city and applying for visa at the destination country embassy makes a hell lot of difference than  living  500 kms away and taking a day  off at work and to go to embassy / pay 100 euros to apply the visa. 

It also means great logistical capability to move around smoothly. Small things matter in travel when you want to do backpack traveling . Resources also means that you get tools/laws to faciliate parameter 1 and 2. Europeans ( ok not all but major western European and Scandinavian nations) are paid extra month's salary as money for Christmas as vacation bonus . Now i call them great extra resources enabling you to do better travel. Imagine you are getting paid one month extra to travel ( This mindset changes things)
Location also matters and i consider great location as great resource to use .


You need all 3 parameters to work fully in your favor to enable world travel. Anything less in any one of them makes it that difficult ..This is why i always felt in my opinion  Americans have not been great world travelers as compared to Western Europeans  because i believe they fare poorly in frames of time . An average American gets 2-3 weeks of vacation compared to 5 weeks in Scandinavia and Switzerland/Austria . That extra 3 week are enough to knock off couple of destinations every year  :) and still spend vacation with family/friends .. Location of Americans also falters them to enable far flung regular world travelers unlike Europeans who in few hours are in new country/region.


 As an example : If you are living in US and you decided to travel to Machu Pichu, Peru  .. Sure living in Manhattan, NY makes it awesome. hop on from JFK and Viola you are in Lima  :) and days later you are staring at the wonder..but how about living in Manhattan, Kansas.  You spend extra money , time just to get to O Hare or JFK to fly , added to if you decided to fly from local airport , flight ticket become so expensive that you start to think , is it really worth it? .. And if you are of nationality who needs Visa to enter Peru , then good luck  :) ( for example an Indian in Kansas, there is no way he is going to Chicago, DC or NY to apply for visa and then fly there again  just so he can get to Peru, He will use that money and chill in Vegas or Lake Tahoe :p)


Its the resources part and balance in all 3 parameters  which makes people from Western Europe and Australia travel more of the world  Australia is a different case and needs some additional explaining but they do just brilliant in all 3 parameters

Another interesting parallel i noticed was .. Many people from countries which are high on Qualitty of Life index  do absolutely well in world travel . Again it reflects on  above basis parameters - They get good vacations, get good money as disposable income( PPP wise) and are in great location of networked society which enables visa free travels, access to world class airports and variety of airlines from low cost to high end to enable varied experience of world travel .. Now i am beginning to understand why are actually ranked best cities/countries to live in  :)


Hence in my opinion , i realized that if you pick to live sometime in anyone of those countries as a resident ( even if that is temporary) it increases your probability of traveling the entire continent/region much higher . I know it sounds obvious , but in my opinion there is slightly finer element as well as not all places in these countries/regions are same. ( living in UK is not exactly same as Living in London in this case)

According to me ,basing yourself in following cities greatly enhances your ability to travel in easier manner .

Europe
1. Zurich/ Geneva/ Munich -  Any of these 3 cities and you have yourself traveling to 50+ countries within  reach . For all non Europeans who need visa,  you have more than 100 countries consulates which processes visas in days . Airports are world class with great variety to choose from Ryan Air/Easy jet and other national carriers to fly to intercontinental destinations like South America and Middle East at decent prices .  Living in these 3 cities also allow you  lap a  great quality of life  ( read 5 weeks of vacation , 13-14 month salary , smart individuals who have great  travel experiences to motivate you , Culture which thrives on taking leisure vacation to be productive workers) All perfect factors to do more traveling  This is as good as it gets to travel :) .

2. London : Behind them London is another great location to live in and travel . Potential  100 countries can be done if you base yourself properly . Possessing the same qualities as above , It does extremely well on Cost and Resource factors,  where i see as only drawback is the time element of it . Londoners don't get same amount of vacation days when compared to Swiss/Germans and with hectic sort of life London thrives in  this can be become detriment to do every year travels  .. However still very much possible to do many countries ..

Other European cities which deserve a mention are Copenhagen and Stockholm ..they do good job doing European travels ,but  if its intercontinental travel,  high airline prices and travel connections due to lack of great connections ( compared to London and Munich) could become a detriment . Nevertheless, if you want to cover all 27 Euro zone nations, they will serve the purpose. If you are in good disposable income category , you have good chance to cover most parts of world as well :)

For those who don't get lucky to live in the above cities , their best bet would be to live in centralized locations/ locations closer to top airports . Austria, Holland  and Germany (Cologne/Frankfurt area)  also helps as you have great connections  to go around . Only challenge comes in getting Visas . However for Schengen its not a problem and these countries still pack the punch .  The only reason i was able to cover all Schengen Countries .

Living in anyone of these places and you are in great position to visit 30 -50+ countries if you plan well ..

Asia Pacific and Oceania

Europe has a great advantage of top infrastructure/ schengen agreement allowing visa free travel to countries/ central geographical location and area of each country and hence  its much easier .. Asia on other hand is a beast. Most countries have poor infrastructure. Asia lacks  good connections at affordable prices. Visas are required for most places and hence traveling entire region becomes challenging .

However on flip side , if you manage to live in these places , there is a good chance for you do most of Asia  nicely .

1. Singapore :  Hub of South East Asia . Changi Airport , Tiger Airlines/Air Asia, not to mention plethora of  airlines connecting Australia, South Africa, NZ, Middle East , Japan and North China from one place  , makes Singapore top dog  in the region . if you are backpacker who wants to explore south east Asia and east Asia . Singapore is just the best thing for you . With its high quality of life allowing you to lead a  good lifestyle, Singapore allows you perfect getaways to the entire region.

2  Sydney : Basing yourself at Sydney , you have a perfect opportunity to hit both Pacific Islands and Major Asian cities . What makes Sydney great as well is high quality of Australian lifestyle and attitude of the city and country allowing you greater freedom to pursue great travel getaways around Australia and  Asia .

3 Hong Kong : I would have listed HK as no 1 if it had gotten itself couple of budget airlines ( I am big sucker of Budget airlines and budget travel) and i believe HK doesn't do that well as SG in terms of budget airline connectivity . hence traveling to places like Thailand gets slightly cumbersome when compared to SG . However only slightly cumbersome  :).  Overall Living in HK  will give you a great shot to do China and East Asia very well . If you have plans to do Siberia/ North Korea and Japan . HK might be your best bet . Although as economy and lifestyle changes taking place in Asia . Shanghai is fast becoming a threat to HK in terms of city to live in and get around .  I predict Shanghai will become like Singapore by next decade as the city to be based if you want to cover all Asia .

Americas
One of the toughest challenge is to cover South and North America . Vastly Huge , they are real tough places to cover in its entirety . I have clubbed South for a reason with North as i am including all nations in Central America as well ..

1. Miami : Yes , In my opinion , If one wants to cover both Americas decently, placing yourself in Miami is a great idea . Not only it has great connections to all of central America and South American cities. With its quality of life , it sets you up nicely to give a shot to visit  Caribbean , Central America, Mexico apart from US much better than many cities of US .

2.  NY : Hands down best connected Airport in Americas . Add in quality of life and you have set yourself well to give a shot to do Canada, US, Mexico and most American countries. Downside : Travel is far and cost sometimes may not be as cheap as you would think especially if you are considering a getaway to Brazil/Chile/Argentina , still much better than most American cities

3. Chicago and LA :  Again the only reason they make it is because of great connectivity to other destinations and that  higher disposable income gives you chance to embark .Presence of consulates in LA can be advantage ( i am unsure if many consulates exists in CHI ) . Location of Chicago can be dampener if you are flying down south to Central and South America ..

Atlanta deserves a mention  for same qualities of LA and NY but i felt as an Indian  ,since visa is required to travel all countries, i am not sure how many consulates are present in the city to get  faster resource at less possible time .

Middle East and Africa

Arguably the toughest segment of the group . Its uniquely difficult to do all countries due to its size, political situation, infrastructure, costs and poor connectivity .

I met a guy who has traveled to 70+ countries in the world and half of them were in Africa and the only way he did that was he was based in Africa for good amount time in an NGO group and thus his job allowed him to travel all central and west African nations..   Africa becomes easier suddenly if you are going for work, however , if you are not ,then its super tough ..

Middle east is slightly easier , however political situation can make it challenging .  Traveling Iraq, Syria is tough ask . Israel while safe and possessing great tourism infrastructure has different challenges to get in.   So is Iran.  However that doesn't mean you cannot do it . It just requires more careful planning.

1. Dubai : Living in UAE can be a great first step to do the entire region . Caveat is you better be in expat/near expat  work lifestyle which gives you good disposable income to travel around . Good connections and good income and you can definitely travel entire middle east with careful planning .

Dubai in my opinion is a  great starting point to do Central Asia . ( i initially thought New Delhi would be great starting point ). It has good connections to Uzbek, Tajik and Turkemenistan .. Bit of planning and effort and you can be in great position to do silk route.

2. Jo'burg/Nairobi /Cairo : Again Africa is a misnomer by many a stretch . However i feel living in these cities can give you a jump start . living in Expat role is definite advantage which would cover the cost and time element . resources is where it will be challenging , however  these three cities  would enable us to do South /East and North Africa at very least  with bit of planning and patience .

I feel living in these cities for sometime ( read 2-5 years ) would allow you to give yourself time and cost to travel the region around it and resources living in places gives you edge to do world travel .


Now for an average traveler, it all sounds obvious that i just listed all major airport cities/alpha cities/ higher income country cities .. but for me these cities place higher edge than their competitors ... There are some places which are historically tougher countries to do . I feel that these living in these cities gives a good opening point than most others .

Happy Traveling folks! :)










Tuesday, November 22, 2011

5 years on

The other day i realized that it was 2 years since i stepped my foot on Antarctica... getting all nostalgic , i decided a small exercise to identify what i have done .. this week in last year .. and results have been very interesting and surprising ...

------------------------------------------------------------------

So here it goes ..


Nov 2010 : India :   i came back from my first business trip to New Delhi  Walmart India office , worked in a Distribution Center ( Think Amazon Fulfillment Center)  and was getting ready to head to Hong Kong , Asia’s world city
 
Nov 2009:  Antarctica :Was somewhere in the middle of nowhere  in Antarctic Peninsula with Rob Swan, Craig Bowen , Anant, Le Tuan ( Mr Highlight of the trip) , a rich Sheikh and the rest of the gang  getting a fever of Football manager and experiencing the awesomness called Antarctica..I did a polar plunge during the that week.

Nov 2008 : Austria : I was in Kohlstattgasse, Innsbruck , planning for the first big solo trip Denmark , Poland and Malmo winter trek with Anant ... first snowfall experience… viewed  Mumbai  26/11 from my innsbruck room in shock...

Nov 2007 : Portugal : I was in Coimbra gatecrashing erasmus parties with lanka Sridhar and trying to figure out how do to C# programming . Experienced my  first Diwali Outside india at a lisbon temple.. 8 Euro meal at a temple will still remain as the memory as one of the best dinners ever ..

Nov 2006  : SNIST Engineering College , Hyd  I  came and went out of CAT 2006 exam and was wondering was the 14K INR on Time Hyd well spent or not? ( On hindsight, its been mixed, met some people and kept in touch ever since) . Also thinking who in the wide eyed mind would understand and read 4-1 Language processors .Survived 4-1 and dreaming of holidaying semester of 4-2 was an  interesting feeling


Interesting Lifetimes… screwing up GRE CAT and studying ( hardly studying) LP , Network Security to C#.Net programming to being accountant/analyst title for 2 years in snow laden village before being working out finance and understanding supply chain has been interesting experience.

Looking back , i get a feeling CAT screw up was one of the best things happened to me ...



Here's to hoping for many more stories to come in next 5, 10, 15 , 20 years ...

Adios,
Silent Cacophony

Monday, February 7, 2011

World Cup is Here

Alritey folks, after 4 years of wait , the biggest spectacle of cricket ( yes , twenty20 is NOT ) is back and is back in Indian Subcontinent , ( rewind your memories of 1996 and 1987 Eden gardens was in center of attention on both occassions and so is this time for being given a miss :) ) .

This is the first time i will miss it seeing it live on Tv  , but will  still following it through internet , annd other avenues..  So who are the favourites to win the title ?

lets do a short review of each team and their chances in WC. 3 teams  a post


Kenya : 2007 was a dream run for them  with reaching a top 4  , possibly will be their best run for some years ,  Strangely i still see Steve Tikolo knocking runs around ( for those who dont know, Steve Tikolo has burst into intl scene in 1996 back in his hey days was the best kenyan  player and had created a sense of for for other teams ( ok fear is  exaggerating!! ) , but 40 year old might be past his prime and it might be  last time we might the  kenyan  Kenya might face Canada and Zim but their chances unlike 2003 dream run  will end in group stage  . World Cup  2011: group stage exit

Australia : 4  world cups , including last 3 consecutive wins  , 4 consecutive final  appearances in last 4 world cups dating from 1996 , 29 unbeaten match streak ( last one losing 12 years ago  against pakistan 1999 WC group match at headingley) , Aussies travel back to Sub continent with not being favorites to win !!! . This is huge relief ofcourse for battered captain Ricky Ponting . 12 years of dominance in world cricket coupled with 3 ashes losses in the same period has questioned Aussies chance at winning 2011 world cup .  Inspite of losing their sheen and losing their golden generation after 2007 WC , they have lost only 28 odis out of 98 odis in last 4 years and come to play  2011 tournament as world's  no 1 in ODI.

Yes they lost Gilly, Haydos, Mcgrath, Warne . Yes Ponting , Clarke are woefully short of form. Yes They lack a good slow bowler to exploit the sub continent conditions but to write off them  will be a mistake teams  will pay  . They still have  a great opening pair of inform Shane Watson and Brad Haddin , Michael Hussey maybe injury struck m but he is still a force to reckon with, David Hussey , Cameron White are still handful for most teams and if Clarke and Ponting hit the form , god save the opponents . Their bowling unit alos looks formidable although lack the grittiness of 2007 and 2003 . Still Lee, Johnson, Tait can be pretty destructive , Weakest link is still slow bowler but  i wil not write them off.. Remember this was the team who won 1999 world cup from jaws of defeat ( defeating windies in 1999 set the tone for the rest of decade ) , 1987 they have done the same thing coming with struggling team . 1996 was when they were still not favourites and yet were close to win  (if not for the histronics of Da silva and Jayasuriya ) , 

I will still put my money on Aussies to  make the semifinals and maybe even finals , not because they are favourite team but because they are  side with  enormous history, spirit and attitude .

Watch out for Punter and his new crop of people . My bet : Semifinals appearance the least,  wining the world cup at best

India : yeah my  national team , the best test team in world, and 2nd best team in Odis,  after 28 years , India finally are arriving Wc as tag of  favourites. Tendulkar playing his last world cup has one trophy missing from his cabinet , and he is desperately trying to avoid the  tag of greatest player not have been part of world cup  squad( Ponting was part of 4 world cup campaigns just to put into perspective) .. Luckily for Tendulkar, not only his form  , but also the team he is part of can be considered India;s best chance to win the world cup . 2003 was the golden generation which missed it by a huge error in the final ( Zak was an idiot  !!)
2007 was lost even before it  began . 2011 they  start off as favourites and the most formidable team in the world .
Yes batting looks phenomenal . Sachin, Sehwag , Gambhir, Yuvraj, Kohli and Dhoni are  major forces and they can create havoc , add in Yusuf Pathan and you  have a beast of batting lineup on paper ( yes papertigers ! but it remains to be seen how they can hold up at home with pressure to win .

Bowling is not too bad although it can be little pale when compared to batting . everything revolves around Zak , who i am sure has learnt his lesson from 2003 , He remains  the best bowler of  this decade for India amd everythung depends on him. Bhajji can be good option although i am never sure how good wicket taker he is .. with Praveen Kumar , nehra, patel, Indian bowling looks a little weak and if team can thrash 2 of them , India is in trouble..

with no spare wicket keeper, Dhoni is under strain to bat , keep and captain and if he misses one of them, India is in spot of bother

While This is the best indian team to have graced a world cup start , It could well be decided by one man perservance to bring the one thing he cherishes  the most now : Sachin  Tendulkar.
His last outing in a tournament which has seen him take his aura to next level ( be it his 140 against Kenya on dusty cuttack pitch in 1996  or swashbuckling 98 against Pakistan at Centurion in 2003) , This is the one thing  his billion followers want him to grab and hold.    India;s chance to win the world cup depend on one man : Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar .

My prediction : Semi final berth atleast and then rest depends on other factors, 

Monday, January 31, 2011

Football Musings

Jan 30/31st always is exiciting day for all football fans across the world.  Transfer  deadline ends in less than 36 hrs and its great to see Telegraph , news of the world, espn , guardian, and many others sucking on the any news they get from the "sources".

Suarez hogs headlines as Liverpool snap up the Dutch Giant Ajax striker  . from 30,000 Ft it looks a great buy , Suarez is in awesome form for Ajax and his world cup form ( saving his howler againts ghana, which was ofcourse shadowed by Gyan ) was something of a  phenomeno, Liverpool finally has woken up from slumber , It was high time Liv'pool  get a quality signing and owners stuck with their original theme to wanting to buy new players ..

But they recieved a "jhatka" less than 24 hrs with the talisman Torres wanting to move away to my team Blues.. Now ofcourse the reds rejected  his transfer request , but nevertheless , it brings in an interesting end to this transfer window , with less than 48 hrs to go , Torres, Anelka, would sweating as to where their futures would lie( fyi : Livpool asked Chelsea on 50million pounds buyout and anelka to start the negotiating the buy of Torres, now tats big money! )

My opinion : Chelsea should go for one last gasp.. Torres is still young when compared to Anelka and is hungrier to play  in UCL , which Liv pool doesnt lool like playing until 2013 ., Naturally he is determined to move , Part of the reason is Torres  moving away could be this . He is one guy who stuck to Livpool during the crisis apart from Gerrard ( diff is Gerrard is Livpool man and Torres moved to  Merseyside outfit from Atletico Madrid to just play for that and get into  big league, no offence to Los Colchoneros fans )
Thus with Livpool moving to 7th last year and  no signs of making better than that , Torres move is very much understanable

And from Chelsea side, its still a good move, mind you chelsea is still looking  for a 3rd good striker to team with Drogba who at 32 is no longer that potent force he was couple of seasons ago, With neymar bid failing, and with David Luiz deal collapsed  chelsea atleast needs to improve the strike for the second half of the season and work on  improving the midfield and defence in the summer, thus torres would be great addition to the blues, he knows english football  and  he is used to pressure of the big clubs, on negative is his injury pronnes , but hey i would still put him better bet than Neymar, who lets face it might be a prodigy but is unproven in English Football arena ( except in fantasy football where he is a legend in makiing :)  )

 David Luiz deal falling off is a big disappoint ment for me , He is a young gun and future star in making , Although  i hoped Chelsea would have done better than that , They could have gone for Simon Kjaer , who in my opinion is the one of the best young defenders in the continental europe .  I hope ancelotti rises to occasion coming season and improve the defence. Midfield is what i am worried as a fan , Lampard will be 33 in June , We need some young guns as long term replacement for lampard.. Eden hazard is great prospect , but i suppose wenger is looking to snap another frenchman to his pseudo french boys team


Finally I hope... Chelsea kick off their campaign to attack  the leaders man u in their pursuit of what i think could be last win for Sir Alex( Man u wont win in 2012 :P) . and as i type this my mouth dropped open as i read Spurs try to secure Aguero in a failed 38.5 Mill GBP bid.  Holy Cow.. what is redknapp thinking ??

Looks like its all set for an exicting end to the finish line? who will  be most content? most rich? most exhilirated ? . We need to wait until 11pm CET

Arvind